Fork on GitHub¶
Before you do anything else, login/signup on GitHub and fork OAuthLib from the GitHub project.
Clone your fork locally¶
If you have git-scm installed, you now clone your git repo using the following command-line argument where <my-github-name> is your account name on GitHub:
git clone firstname.lastname@example.org/<my-github-name>/oauthlib.git
The list of outstanding OAuthLib feature requests and bugs can be found on our on our GitHub issue tracker. Pick an unassigned issue that you think you can accomplish, add a comment that you are attempting to do it, and shortly your own personal label matching your GitHub ID will be assigned to that issue.
Feel free to propose issues that aren’t described!
oauthlib community rules¶
oauthlib is a community of developers which adheres to a very simple set of rules.
Code of Conduct¶
This project adheres to a Code of Conduct based on Django. As a community member you have to read and agree with it.
For more information please contact us and/or visit the original Django Code of Conduct homepage.
Setting up topic branches and generating pull requests¶
While it’s handy to provide useful code snippets in an issue, it is better for you as a developer to submit pull requests. By submitting pull request your contribution to OAuthlib will be recorded by Github.
In git it is best to isolate each topic or feature into a “topic branch”. While individual commits allow you control over how small individual changes are made to the code, branches are a great way to group a set of commits all related to one feature together, or to isolate different efforts when you might be working on multiple topics at the same time.
While it takes some experience to get the right feel about how to break up
commits, a topic branch should be limited in scope to a single
submitted to an issue tracker.
Also since GitHub pegs and syncs a pull request to a specific branch, it is the ONLY way that you can submit more than one fix at a time. If you submit a pull from your master branch, you can’t make any more commits to your master without those getting added to the pull.
To create a topic branch, its easiest to use the convenient
-b argument to
git checkout -b fix-broken-thing Switched to a new branch 'fix-broken-thing'
You should use a verbose enough name for your branch so it is clear what it is about. Now you can commit your changes and regularly merge in the upstream master as described below.
When you are ready to generate a pull request, either for preliminary review, or for consideration of merging into the project you must first push your local topic branch back up to GitHub:
git push origin fix-broken-thing
Now when you go to your fork on GitHub, you will see this branch listed under the “Source” tab where it says “Switch Branches”. Go ahead and select your topic branch from this list, and then click the “Pull request” button.
Here you can add a comment about your branch. If this in response to a submitted issue, it is good to put a link to that issue in this initial comment. The repo managers will be notified of your pull request and it will be reviewed (see below for best practices). Note that you can continue to add commits to your topic branch (and push them up to GitHub) either if you see something that needs changing, or in response to a reviewer’s comments. If a reviewer asks for changes, you do not need to close the pull and reissue it after making changes. Just make the changes locally, push them to GitHub, then add a comment to the discussion section of the pull request.
Pull upstream changes into your fork¶
It is critical that you pull upstream changes from master into your fork on a regular basis. Nothing is worse than putting in a days of hard work into a pull request only to have it rejected because it has diverged too far from master.
To pull in upstream changes:
git remote add upstream https://github.com/oauthlib/oauthlib.git git fetch upstream
Check the log to be sure that you actually want the changes, before merging:
git log upstream/master
Then merge the changes that you fetched:
git merge upstream/master
For more info, see https://help.github.com/fork-a-repo/
How to get your pull request accepted¶
We want your submission. But we also want to provide a stable experience for our users and the community. Follow these rules and you should succeed without a problem!
Run the tests!¶
Before you submit a pull request, please run the entire OAuthLib test suite from the project root via:
The first thing the core committers will do is run this command. Any pull request that fails this test suite will be rejected.
Testing multiple versions of Python¶
OAuthLib supports Python 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and PyPy 2.7 & PyPy 3. Testing all versions conveniently can be done using Tox.
We recommend using the latest patch version for each Python version we support and the latest PyPy versions. The versions beloew may not be up to date.
$ pyenv install 3.5.7 $ pyenv install 3.6.9 $ pyenv install 3.7.4 $ pyenv install pypy2.7-7.1.1 $ pyenv install pypy3.6-7.1.1
Test upstream applications¶
Remember, OAuthLib is used by several 3rd party projects. If you think you submit a breaking change, confirm that other projects builds are not affected.
If you add code you need to add tests!¶
We’ve learned the hard way that code without tests is undependable. If your pull request reduces our test coverage because it lacks tests then it will be rejected.
Also, keep your tests as simple as possible. Complex tests end up requiring their own tests. We would rather see duplicated assertions across test methods than cunning utility methods that magically determine which assertions are needed at a particular stage. Remember: Explicit is better than implicit.
Don’t mix code changes with whitespace cleanup¶
If you change two lines of code and correct 200 lines of whitespace issues in a file the diff on that pull request is functionally unreadable and will be rejected. Whitespace cleanups need to be in their own pull request.
Keep your pull requests limited to a single issue¶
OauthLib pull requests should be as small/atomic as possible. Large, wide-sweeping changes in a pull request will be rejected, with comments to isolate the specific code in your pull request. Some examples:
- If you are making spelling corrections in the docs, don’t modify any Python code.
- If you are adding a new module don’t ‘cleanup’ other modules. That cleanup in another pull request.
- Changing any attributes of a module, such as permissions on a file should be in its own pull request with explicit reasons why.
Follow PEP-8 and keep your code simple!¶
Memorize the Zen of Python:
>>> python -c 'import this'
Please keep your code as clean and straightforward as possible. When we see more than one or two functions/methods starting with _my_special_function or things like __builtins__.object = str we start to get worried. Rather than try and figure out your brilliant work we’ll just reject it and send along a request for simplification.
Furthermore, the pixel shortage is over. We want to see:
- package instead of pkg
- grid instead of g
- my_function_that_does_things instead of mftdt
Be sure to write documentation!¶
Documentation isn’t just good, it’s great - and necessary with large packages like OAuthlib. Please make sure the next person who reads your function/method can quickly understand what it does and how. Also, please ensure the parameters passed to each function are properly documented as well.
The project has these goals/requests for docstrings that are designed to make the autogenerated documentation read more cleanly:
- Every parameter in the function should be listed in the docstring, and should appear in the same order as they appear in the function itself.
- If you are unsure of the best wording for a parameter description, leave it blank, but still include the :param foo: line. This will make it easier for maintainers to see and edit.
- Use an existing standardized description of a parameter that appears elsewhere in this project’s documentation whenever possible. For example, request is used as a parameter throughout the project with the description “OAuthlib request.” - there is no reason to describe it differently in your function. Parameter descriptions should be a sentence that ends with a period - even if it is just two words.
- When possible, include a type declaration for the parameter. For example, a “request” param is often accompanied with :type request: oauthlib.common.Request. The type is expected to be an object type reference, and should never end in a period.
- If there is a textual docstring (recommended), use a single blank line to separate the docstring and the params.
- When you cite class functions, please use backticks.
- def foo(self, request, client, bar=None, key=None):
“”” This method checks the key against the client. The request is passed to maintain context.
Example MAC Authorization header, linebreaks added for clarity
- Authorization: MAC id=”h480djs93hd8”,
- nonce=”1336363200:dj83hs9s”, mac=”bhCQXTVyfj5cmA9uKkPFx1zeOXM=”
param request: OAuthlib request. type request: oauthlib.common.Request
- Client object set by you, see
param key: MAC given provided by token endpoint. “”“
How pull requests are checked, tested, and done¶
First we pull the code into a local branch:
git remote add <submitter-github-name> email@example.com:<submitter-github-name>/oauthlib.git git fetch <submitter-github-name> git checkout -b <branch-name> <submitter-github-name>/<branch-name>
Then we run the tests:
We finish with a non-fastforward merge (to preserve the branch history) and push to GitHub:
git checkout master git merge --no-ff <branch-name> git push upstream master